Category Archives: Commentary

Links and short clippings from around the web. May be accompanied by snarky or pseudo-intellectual comment.

How A Pirate Was Born

When a film stu­dent (capt_wink_martindale on red­dit) tried to make a movie based on Isaac Asimov’s I, Robot around the time the Will Smith-starrer of the same name came out:

Part of the project was to make posters, trail­ers, and a web­site for the film. We even went so far as to cre­ate our own pro­duc­tion com­pany, as to look pro­fes­sional. Some­how the legal team from the stu­dio found out about a stu­dent project, in a small pri­vate col­lege in the Mid­west, with no bud­get, being shot in a ware­house base­ment, and decided to issue a cease and desist order. Basi­cally, what that means, is that the studio’s lawyers said to us, “You’re using our prop­erty. Stop, or we’ll sue you into the stone age.” I responded by send­ing them the con­sent form from the Asi­mov estate, and explained that it was a stu­dent project, not a com­mer­cial ven­ture worth lit­i­gat­ing. I turned over our script, our shoot­ing notes, our shot list, copies of our tapes and even the con­cept art drawings.

Instead of the let­ter rec­og­niz­ing our valiant efforts as stu­dents that I expected, I found myself on the tail end of a phone call that changed my life. I was con­tacted directly by the lead of the studio’s legal team, who explained my sit­u­a­tion to me very clearly. He told me that I was tech­ni­cally in my legal right to use Isaac Asimov’s mate­r­ial. How­ever, if I chose to pro­ceed, they would file mul­ti­ple law­suits total­ing over 2 mil­lion dol­lars against me. In the end, I might win, but it would take hun­dreds of thou­sands of dol­lars in legal fees just to fight it, but would cost them noth­ing more than the salaries they already pay their lawyers. It would be 10 years before any type of ver­dict could be levied, and by then it wouldn’t mat­ter what the out­come was, since their film would be long since released.

This is how cre­ativ­ity is encour­aged. This is what hap­pens to aspir­ing small-time film-makers whose paths cross with the big studios.

/via @nimbupani

Perfect Rest

There is noth­ing in her appear­ance but per­fect rest. You would sup­pose her qui­etly asleep.”

— Charles Dick­ens in a let­ter to his wife, Cather­ine, break­ing the news gen­tly about their 8-month old daughter’s death.

Read the entire let­ter. One of the most painful let­ters any­one would have ever had to write.

Vessels

The ves­sels we cre­ate often deter­mine the things that con­tain them. Also, chang­ing the ves­sel can change our per­cep­tion and our expe­ri­ence and what we place in them.”

— Patrick Rhone in Ves­sels, Names, and Frames

If you are the mes­sen­ger, remem­ber: the medium is as impor­tant as the message.

Even Steve Jobs Used Slide Decks

Peo­ple who know what they are talk­ing about don’t need PowerPoint.”

— Steve Jobs quoted in Wal­ter Isaacson’s mem­oir Steve Jobs.

This quote has become fairly pop­u­lar after it was fea­tured in a post by Pre­sen­ta­tionZen. If you think there is rea­son enough to ban slide decks alto­gether, I’d say no.

I too, like most white-collared work­ers, have been sub­jected to one too many sleep-inducing pre­sen­ta­tions with wordy slide decks that never seemed to end. But are we right in blam­ing Pow­er­Point? Isn’t it just a tool that is harm­ful when it falls into the wrong hands? Shouldn’t we be blam­ing poor pre­sen­ters instead?

The hypocrisy of Steve’s state­ment is evi­dent when you real­ize that he loved using slides:

We had one rule that really both­ered him: We never allowed slides, which were his main pre­sen­ta­tion tool.

One year, about an hour before his appear­ance, I was informed that he was back­stage prepar­ing dozens of slides, even though I had reminded him a week ear­lier of the no-slides pol­icy. I asked two of his top aides to tell him he couldn’t use the slides, but they each said they couldn’t do it, that I had to. So, I went back­stage and told him the slides were out. Famously prickly, he could have stormed out, refused to go on. And he did try to argue with me.”

— Walt Moss­berg in The Steve Jobs I Knew

Yes, the very same per­son who appears to be blam­ing slide decks was irri­tated when he was not allowed to use them.

Of course, there is a dif­fer­ence between Steve’s slide deck and the com­mon office meet­ing slide deck. Steve’s were always beau­ti­ful and often nar­rated a story. A suc­cess­ful pre­sen­ta­tion is noth­ing but a story well told. And slides can help you in the sto­ry­telling process if you use it right.

By blam­ing “Pow­er­Point”, Steve is just pok­ing fun at a prod­uct devel­oped by Apple’s com­peti­tor, Microsoft. He could just as well have men­tioned Keynote (or sim­ply ‘slides’) but he didn’t. He phrased his words in a way that peo­ple would iden­tify with and, at the same time, show Apple’s com­peti­tors in a poor light.

That was the genius of Steve Jobs. And every­one fell for it.

Critic

The wall is an equal­izer. It doesn’t mat­ter how long you spent or how hard you tried. What’s on the wall is all there is. When we pub­lish, we open a line of engage­ment where crit­i­cism is an option, so we must learn to not only receive the feed­back of oth­ers, but learn to give it in a civil, artic­u­late, and help­ful way.

— Frank Chimero in The Wall

Before we slit each other’s throats in debates while insult­ing oth­ers’ per­sonal choices and tastes, let’s pause—take a deep breath—and think really hard about how we speak or write.

Business is Personal

Joe Fox: It wasn’t… per­sonal.
Kath­leen Kelly: What is that sup­posed to mean? I am so sick of that. All that means is that it wasn’t per­sonal to you. But it was per­sonal to me. It’s *per­sonal* to a lot of peo­ple. And what’s so wrong with being per­sonal, any­way?
Joe Fox: Uh, noth­ing.
Kath­leen Kelly: What­ever else any­thing is, it ought to begin by being personal.

— scene from You’ve Got Mail.

Some­thing at office yes­ter­day reminded me of this movie. When I saw it for the first time, I paid no atten­tion to the busi­ness and ide­ol­ogy part of the story. Now I do and I find it fascinating.

Undying Patience

Through Nick’s drug addic­tion, I learned that par­ents can bear almost any­thing. Every time we reach a point where we feel as if we can’t bear any more, we do.

– David Sheff in My Addicted Son

You Are What You Learn

It’s easy to feel trapped in your own life. Cir­cum­stances can some­times feel as if they form a jail around you. But there’s almost noth­ing you can’t learn your way out of. If you don’t like who you are, you have the option of learn­ing until you become some­one else. Life is like a jail with an unlocked, heavy door. You’re free the minute you real­ize the door will open if you sim­ply lean into it.

— Scott Adams in Who Are You?

This goes up on my wall.

World’s Best Breakfasts

Don’t see this list if you are on an empty — or even half-empty — stom­ach right now. My favourites are 13 and 15 in the list. Not that I’ve had them but if I did, I wouldn’t be skip­ping break­fasts. EVER.

What Google Reader is to me

One of the most impor­tant things for me about gReader is that it bal­ances the two pri­mary uses of the inter­net: infor­ma­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Dis­cus­sion that fol­lows the shar­ing of infor­ma­tion – blog posts, news items, opin­ion pieces, edi­to­r­ial images, book reviews, pic­tures of Zoe Sal­dana, etc – is more mean­ing­ful, directed, and inter­est­ing to me than post after post of peo­ple talk­ing about them­selves. I like that the pri­mary verb of gReader is “share” – but not about you; about con­tent that’s mean­ing­ful to you. I like that I have to click on a spe­cific tab in order to get the lit­tle win­dow that allows me to post only about myself. I like that gReader pro­vides a sin­gle inter­face to both read con­tent on the inter­net AND dis­cuss that con­tent with my friends.

– Court­ney Stan­ton in Wherein I try to explain why Google Reader is the best social net­work cre­ated so far

Google Reader is the place on the web that I spend most of my time. It’s a haven for vora­cious read­ers like me and I’m quite wor­ried that changes to it might break it. Even before the main com­peti­tor Blog­lines almost went bust, Google Reader has had a monop­oly on the online feed reader mar­ket. Noth­ing else came close. It was a monop­oly that nobody could truly dis­rupt till now. There are com­pa­nies like feedly and Reeder who built their prod­ucts around Google Reader instead of try­ing to com­pete with it.

I hope Google under­stands the impli­ca­tions of any changes and don’t stray too far away from the orig­i­nal prod­uct. But it doesn’t help much when they warn you by say­ing, “If you don’t like it, take your data and leave.” I’m keep­ing my fin­gers crossed.